Masculine vs Female-Run Countries
Why Harvard & Mensa Have Been the stupidest Conversations I Have Ever Had
Preface
Before you read this, it is important to remember that if the situation were reversed, with all violence accepted and no barriers to negative masculine behavior, the article would be written completely differently, calling for a stop to violence. However, Western countries face a lack of regulations and cultural barriers to women’s negative behavior.
Keep in mind that, just as violence is fairly evenly distributed between men and women (48 to 52%), the 99th percentile of agreeableness is almost exclusively women. Manipulativeness and dishonesty (i.e., agreeableness) are traits where women dominate the top percentile. This doesn’t mean all women are dishonest, but rather that completely ignoring these negative feminine characteristics has significant outcomes.
Introduction to Masculine-Run and Female-Run SocietiesMasculine vs Female-Run Countries:
The core traits which make up a feminine society are:
- Short-term over long-term solutions (i.e., dishonesty/agreeableness)
- Image of substance (ego over honor)
- Power over competence (equality over fairness)
Men can and do exhibit these traits. The critical point is the mental framework behind the systems, not the gender of the individuals involved. Evolutionarily, women have these traits due to their physical limitations and short fertility window, making equality, power, and short-term thinking more relevant for them.
Features of Female-Run Societies
Open Dishonesty
In female-run societies, power often comes from controlled language and speech. By controlling words, women can define concepts to suit their perspectives. For instance, defining misogyny as anyone who opposes them, rather than as anger or hatred towards women, is an example.
Women typically do not confront issues directly but may undermine others covertly. They might report, gaslight, or attack indirectly. While some men also behave this way, the propensity for such behavior is generally higher among women.
Short-Term Thinking
Short-term thinking is a common feature in female-run environments. For example, in New York, where theft is tolerated and violence laws are strict, dishonesty is openly accepted, and there is no countermeasure to address it.
Compare this to environments where violence is regulated but short-term thinking prevails. In Australia, lockdowns led to the closure of 20,000 businesses, damaging the economy. The country now relies on resource extraction, animal products, and “education” (i.e., female bias training). This short-term approach to power and ego has led to economic decline.
Avoidance of Responsibility
Female-run groups often avoid taking responsibility for negative outcomes. Instead of admitting mistakes, they may celebrate superficial successes. When businesses like Airtasker move overseas to avoid high taxes, the response may be to criticize the company rather than address the underlying issues.
- Silencing Tactics: Reporting, shaming, and using words like “narcissistic” or “misogynistic” to suppress dissent.
- Response to Business Decisions: Criticizing companies rather than addressing systemic issues.
Equality Over Fairness
Female-run societies may prioritize equality over fairness. For instance, in Australia, nurses are overpaid compared to the economic value they bring, reflecting a focus on equality in pay rather than fairness. This approach can lead to unsustainable practices and systemic issues, as seen in historical examples of countries that failed under similar ideologies.
Conclusion
The goals of female-run societies often revolve around power, money, and ego with a short-term focus, while masculine-run societies typically aim for peace, fairness, and long-term stability. Female-run environments, such as those in New York or Australia, often reflect:
- Short-Term Thinking: Focus on immediate gains rather than long-term consequences.
- Dishonesty: Tolerance for manipulation and deceit.
- Ego-Centrism: Emphasis on personal power and status.
In contrast, masculine-run societies tend to have a more balanced approach to fairness and long-term planning. They emphasize honesty, responsibility, and sustainable practices.
For those seeking a more balanced and fair environment, it may be beneficial to consider moving to countries with a reputation for equitable treatment of both genders and fair economic practices. Countries like Dubai, Hong Kong, Japan, Qatar, Malaysia, Taiwan, Saudi Arabia, and Norway are examples where gender-based dishonesty and abusive behavior are less prevalent, and fairness is more effectively managed.
If you have concerns about cultural dynamics affecting your life or your children’s future, exploring these options might provide a more balanced and equitable living environment.
For further insights, you may also want to watch this video: YouTube Link.